Are New Varieties Really Better?
April 2nd, 2019
Every new growing season brings a boatload of new plant introductions, most of them trumpeting some sort of improvement or new twist, if not one-of-a-kind break-throughs.
They can’t all be better, can they?
The short answer is no. Many are more of the same, and some aren’t even as good as what’s already on the market.
However, when you look at the whole of what we can pick from now vs. 20 or 30 years ago, we’re light years ahead.
Plant breeders and seed companies have done an amazing job at bringing us new choices that bloom better, bloom longer, fight off disease, and grow in more compact, easier-to-care-for habits.
I spend a lot of time evaluating and writing about new varieties because I believe that picking superior plants and getting them in the right spot is one of the two keys to gardening success – good soil being the other. (Living well away from deer is a third!)
One of the comments to my new-plant series this year made me wonder, though, whether gardeners are taking advantage of the good stuff.
“Differences over what’s currently on the market is minuscule,” reader Owen said about my PennLive post on new annual flowers. “Every company just wants to expand every line they have and put out new cultivars to maximize plant royalties.”
There’s some truth in that cynicism, mainly when it comes to differences in annuals from one company’s line to another.