Are Lawns Horrible?
October 5th, 2021
I detect a growing sentiment – apparently a corollary to the native-plant and save-the-pollinators movements – that we all should stop growing lawns.
It seems to go beyond just shrinking lawn space in favor of something more useful into a belief that lawns are downright evil.
I’ve gleaned smatterings of that the past couple of years and heard opinions to that effect in a class I taught on lawn alternatives for Phipps Conservatory last summer.
What nailed it down was an email I got from a reader (following a lawn-care post) that bluntly said, “Don’t you know that lawns are horrible? They are a desert for insects and thus birds. Plant a meadow.”
So are lawns ecological wastelands that we all should get rid of as soon as possible? Are lawns really “horrible?”
While I’m far from a lawn fanatic, my view is that like any other plant, turfgrass has its pros and cons as well as legitimate uses in our landscapes.
I agree that meadows, native-plant gardens, and generally more diverse plantings are better at “servicing” the ecosystem.
I agree that lawns cover an inordinate amount of our yard space, mainly because they’re cheap and easy to install, familiar to people, and ideal for foot-traffic uses, such as kids’ play space, entertaining, and pet runs. Turfgrass is basically our default plant choice.
And I agree that lawns are a key source of water pollution, given all of the fertilizer, crabgrass preventers, grub controls, insecticides, and fungicides that some people use to achieve their green carpets.
But horrible? An ecologic desert? I think that’s taking it a bit too far.